PREMIUMIndonesia to get new business license regime with omnibus bill

first_imgGoogle Topics : Log in with your social account LOG INDon’t have an account? Register here Facebook omnibus-bill omnibus-law job-creation BKPM investment-coordinating-board Bahlil-Lahadalia license Linkedin Forgot Password ? The government will introduce a new business licensing regime in the omnibus bill on job creation to boost competitiveness and bolster investment as Indonesia’s ranking in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business (EODB) index stagnates at 73rd.The draft omnibus bill obtained by The Jakarta Post introduces the new “business licensing” mechanism issued by the central government, streamlined through the Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM), according to the bill’s draft and Presidential Instruction (Inpres) No. 7/2019 on the acceleration of ease of doing business.BKPM head Bahlil Lahadalia said on Monday that the board had started to handle all licensing issuance as per Jan. 31. The new system will cut licensing hurdles as issuance was previously spread across government institutions and regional administrations, causing uncertainty to both investors and b…last_img read more

A retro home stuck in another era sells just before it was due to go under the hammer

first_imgThe new owner plans to update the home.According to Place – Bulimba agent Rachel Fechner, the home which was owned by the same family since it was constructed back in 1960 retained much of the look from that decade.“It’s not everyone’s cup of tea,” Ms Fechner said. Perfect for parties.But with a large 371 sqm of internal floorspace, including an expansive rumpus room and bar, the buyer saw a lot of potential in the home. “He had been looking for quite some time for a project, something he could bring a new vibe to and do it up,” she said. Among the unusual additions to the home are a wrought iron staircase, originally from the Commonwealth Bank building in George St, and 1960s era cream carpet. TIME WARP: A home that remained virtually unchanged since the 1960s was sold to a keen buyer right before auction.A massive home that looks like a time capsule of the 1960s was snapped up just hours before it was due to go to auction.center_img Like stepping back in time.More from newsParks and wildlife the new lust-haves post coronavirus19 hours agoNoosa’s best beachfront penthouse is about to hit the market19 hours agoThe five-bedroom home at 56 Delsie St in Cannon Hill was set to be auctioned early yesterday morning before a buyer made a successful offer of $700,000 on late Friday night. last_img read more

Policy vacuum clouds a bright future

first_imgINTRO: A unique opportunity to restructure Australia’s fragmented and neglected rail network into a profitable industry providing cost-effective, reliable and safe transport will be lost if the federal and state governments fail to create the right framework for private investmentBYLINE: John KirkDirectorAustralasian Railway AssociationTHERE IS A HIGH level of optimism about the future of rail in Australia. Evidence of this can be found in the strong private sector interest among bidders in the sale of Australian National, the price paid by the successful bidders (A$95·4m), and the number of privately funded rail projects in progress or planned. In addition, three private companies are successfully operating freight trains in the east – west corridor.Against this background, it is very difficult to provide a frank analysis of the current situation without being accused of talking down the future of the industry, and thus devaluing publicly-owned assets which are up for sale.It is especially hard for the Director of a relatively new (but very pro-active) industry body – the Australasian Railway Association (see box p698) – to caution against the implicit assumption that the private sector operators can somehow find a way of sorting out fundamental problems such as gross inconsistencies in road and rail infrastructure pricing and funding. Railway reform can succeed in Australia as it has done in New Zealand, Japan and elsewhere. But the policy framework does have to be right, and in Australia it is seriously defective.Reform, with or without privatisation, will not work where there is a substantial legacy of under-investment in rail infrastructure, fragmentation of safety and technical standards, and grossly inadequate recovery of external costs (including road provision) from competing road transport.The business community in Australia has come to understand the potential of rail to conquer the ’tyranny of distance’. Rail is being considered as a key line-haul link in the logistics chain, and some potential buyers of privatised organisations see big opportunities in this sector.Despite all the uncertainties and dithering at the political level, three private train operators have entered the east – west corridor. Using hired traction, crews and wagons, Specialised Container Transport and TNT Australia are operating between Melbourne and Perth, and Patrick Stevedores between Melbourne and Adelaide.The question is: how do we persuade our politicians that rail freight is worth taking seriously, and help them to understand what changes are essential for sustained success? Aside from lobbying and campaigning by ARA and other bodies, the federal government has taken two initiatives that may produce policy directions in due course.First, it has created the National Transport Council to improve the quality of industry advice to the Minister of Transport, John Sharp; Vince Graham, Managing Director of NRC, represents rail. Secondly, it has set up an inquiry into the role of rail in national transport by the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Communications, Transport & Macroeconomic Reform.A third initiative, taken by the transport ministers through the Australian Transport Council, was to call a Rail Summit in Melbourne on September 10. Although the catalyst was the argument over which line should be built to Darwin (box p697), rail industry leaders were confident that a number of more useful outcomes might be achieved.Foremost on their shopping list was the establishment of a government funded national rail research body similar to the National Road Transport Commission, which has been very successful in harmonising road regulations and determining reforms that have improved the quality and efficiency of trucking. The other issues included the need for intermodal competitive neutrality, the cost of network access, the role of government in infrastructure investment, and the application of consistent rigorous assessment criteria to all transport investment.Conflicting objectivesThe political structure of Australia, which is a federation of six states and two territories, leads inevitably to a conflict of objectives not only between the federal government in Canberra and the state governments, but also between one state and another.Land transport is a state responsibility. Australia’s notorious gauge problem – alleviated if not resolved by conversion of the principal interstate routes to standard gauge between 1930 and 1995 – is one of the more visible results.Less obvious, but highly relevant to the development of a national interstate network open to competing private train operators, are the many complex and differing safety and technical standards evolved by the government railways in each state. These pose a serious barrier to new and existing operators who want to invest in rolling stock and operate with maximum efficiency.After lengthy negotiations, the Intergovernmental Agreement on Rail Safety came into effect on July 1 1996. This provides for a national system of safety accreditation of owners and operators based on Australian Standard AS4292, although accreditation is still a state rather than a national responsibility. The agreement does not deal with technical standards affecting the registration of rolling stock, nor does it have any impact on the plethora of safe-working and communications systems across the nation.Some 14 months after it should have come into force on July 1 1996, this agreement has still not been signed by Tasmania and the Northern Territory. Some states have yet to enact their legislation to implement properly the first of the much-needed national reforms. But the National Accreditation Guidelines prepared by the state regulators have already come under fire from the rail industry. Government and private operators large and small are critical of the costs involved in meeting the guidelines which do not conform to AS 4292.If reaching agreement on purely technical issues such as safety standards is so tortuous, it is hardly surprising that the policy objectives of the governments are seriously out of step.AN sale in progressThe Federal and Victorian governments are moving rapidly to privatise their rail operations. The announcement of the successful bidders for the three AN business units was expected in early August, but several bidders were called to submit revised offers for further consideration by the Federal Office of Asset Sales. On August 28 the federal transport minister John Sharp announced that AN would be sold to three separate consortia (p703).The Federal Government has also said that it intends to sell its shares in National Rail Corporation by the end of 1998, a move that is supported by the board and senior management. The other two shareholders, Victoria and New South Wales, are expected to sell their shares too.Withheld from the sale of AN assets were the standard gauge interstate routes linking South Australia with WA, NSW, Victoria and the NT. It is proposed that these lines will be managed by a federal agency, but until this is established AN’s Track Access unit will continue to manage them and charge access fees to train operators. The unit is directly responsible to the federal transport minister in Canberra.Negotiations are under way with the relevant states to resolve the issues stalling the creation of a national track access regime. The federal government has made some funding available from July 1 1998 to enable the regime to commence business.In Victoria, the Public Transport Corporation is being restructured into stand-alone businesses which are destined for sale. Victorian Rail Track Corporation (VicTrack) will maintain and manage access to the non-metropolitan non-electrified infrastructure including the two standard gauge interstate routes from Melbourne to the NSW and South Australian borders.Originally, the government said it would retain ownership of rail infrastructure, but recent announcements indicate that all assets may in fact be sold.V/Line Freight Corp is expected to be sold as a train operator in 1998. Competitors will be able to negotiate with VicTrack for access rights, on terms which the establishing legislation merely says must be ’fair and reasonable’. They can also use the Trade Practices Act to obtain access if negotiations are unsuccessful.There are country passenger services radiating from Melbourne on five routes. Trains on the routes to Warrnambool and Shepparton are already operated by private companies under slightly different arrangements. West Coast Railways and Hoys have seven-year franchises for their respective services, beginning in July and August 1994. WCR owns its own rolling stock, whilst Hoys leases from the PTC. Both pay access fees for the routes between Melbourne and the destinations, and both receive a CSO contribution for state-imposed concession terms. The remaining services operated by the PTC will be put out to tender by the state government as part of the PTC privatisation. The PTC operates an extensive network of heavy rail and tram/light rail routes covering the built-up zone in and around Melbourne. The electric suburban train service will be split for sale into two networks, and the tramways into two.Privatisation not universalThus far, the governments of Western Australia, Queensland and NSW have not said that they intend to privatise their railways.Westrail and Queensland Rail remain vertically integrated businesses, and the fact that both are profitable (apart from explicit subsidy for urban and country passenger trains) means that pressure for restructuring is muted.Nevertheless, both states are setting up open access regimes that should eventually allow new entrants to compete with the government railways. A Queensland Competition Authority is being put in place to administer the open access regime and arbitrate on disputes between QR and new entrants.Queensland is the only government to have implemented a long term programme of investment in rail infrastructure so as to bring it up to modern standards. In addition to new and upgraded heavy haul lines moving coal to the sea for export, major improvements have been made to the trunk line between Brisbane and Cairns including deviations and electrification throughout south of Rockhampton. However, it should be noted that the QR investment of over A$700m was funded through borrowings to be paid back with interest, unlike the billions of dollars of state grants sunk into road improvements.New South Wales is the only state to sign a long-term (7-year) CSO agreement. NSW is also investing A$250m a year into capital works and A$500m for routine and periodic maintenance of rail infrastructure. Last year, NSW split its State Rail Authority into four organisations handling passengers, freight, track access and infrastructure maintenance.The Rail Access Corp manages the infrastructure, outsourcing the actual work of maintenance and construction, and arranges access for train operators within the provisions of the Trade Practices Act. The negotiated price must meet the direct cost and full incremental cost imposed by the operator’s trains, and the rate of return on RAC’s assets must not exceed 14%. The government-owned Railway Services Authority is the incumbent maintenance contractor for much of RAC’s network. RSA provides construction, maintenance and technical advice to RAC under a series of Deeds of Agreement. Infrastructure maintenance work is now open to competition from the private sector, starting with the East Hills line in the Sydney suburbs.NSW’s major rail freight operator is now known as FreightCorp, but remains state-owned. It has recently won large long-term contracts to haul coal from the Hunter Valley against threatened private competition, and is launching other innovative freight services for its customers. The residual State Rail Authority remains responsible for country, commuter and urban passenger operations.Absence of policyWhat is clearly evident from both the Commonwealth and Victoria asset sales is the lack of any real transport policy, such as exists in Queensland, for example. Both governments simply want to rid themselves of the troublesome railway as quickly as possible, while generating as much cash as they can from sales.In the case of AN, the government was extremely happy with the results of the sale, with final bids higher than expected. This was despite some comment from bidders expressing dismay at the short time frame, and many changes to the bidding parameters.Indeed, comparing the recent privatisation of airports with the sale of AN, some commentators attributed the difference in approach to the government’s lack of understanding of the role of rail in the nation’s transport task.For example, how can investors judge the prospects for making a return on AN assets when a conflict of objectives exists over track access regimes and private investment in the infrastructure?Notwithstanding the One Nation programme of 1992-95, which saw Melbourne – Adelaide converted to standard gauge (RG 7.95 p445) and modest improvements to the Melbourne – Brisbane route, the federal government has shown no consistency in funding rail and road investment. Despite claims by the Federal Minister for Transport that the government’s objective is to make rail more competitive with road, the 1997-98 federal budget allocates A$175m over four years from 1998-99 for main line rail infrastructure upgrading compared to A$1 600m for road spending in just the one financial year. Over the past 20 years the federal government has spent A$1·5bn on rail investment and A$32bn on roads.Track access debateThe whole question of control and charging for track access is the subject of heated debate, and delicate negotiations began in July with the aim of thrashing out a solution by September 10. At the time of writing two initiatives were being taken, and the Federal Minister of Transport was confident that a national access regime could be established. The Commonwealth Department of Transport is negotiating with each of the states to establish an agreed position, and at the same time the state access providers are engaged in discussions to try and determine an industry solution. As well as funding and control issues, the state infrastructure providers are looking to improve service to operators through greater uniformity in terms of operation, communications and safe-working practices. The proliferation of accreditation agencies alone has created a barrier to new entrants and imposed a huge cost burden on existing operators.Track Australia, proposed by the former Labour government, was to have owned and controlled access to the interstate trunk lines (at least) so that operators between the major cities would have only one organisation to deal with. This fading dream is now being revived by access providers, who are discussing a possible ’one stop shop’ for all operators both interstate and intrastate.The federal government has put forward a number of models for a national track access regime. The model currently favoured by the Federal Departments of Finance and Treasury sees the states retaining ownership of the track, and the Commonwealth providing a centralised ’one-stop shop’ to broker deals between operators and the state access providers. Initially, the eastern states were said to favour this because they have significant intrastate traffic over which they wish to retain control. The model favoured by Federal Minister for Transport John Sharp would see Commonwealth control over the network through a national authority, but with the states making financial contributions towards the maintenance of the assets.The major sticking points to an agreed outcome are: who should fund the ongoing maintenance and upgrading of the network; the passing of control over state infrastructure to the Commonwealth; and access pricing policy. The states want the Commonwealth to pay for interstate rail infrastructure in the same way as they pay for national highways and roads of national importance. The Commonwealth wants the states to contribute.The eastern states are resisting any form of national control over their corridors, as this would continue the duplication of access agencies. The operation of a small percentage of interstate business could also unduly affect the much larger volume of intrastate activity; the tail wagging the dog! Solutions being proposed include the creation of a board representing access providers to manage track access, and substantial Commonwealth funding to separate the freight and urban passenger networks in Sydney to ease peak-hour congestion.What is urgently needed is the alignment of financial and managerial responsibility, and of ownership and investment. The operators want a workable and affordable solution. The access providers are trying to find an acceptable solution. The federal government is also trying to find a solution. But until the conflicting objectives and political agenda can be resolved, the conundrum remains.Private funding soughtThe Commonwealth wants to see private investment in rail infrastructure; the transport minister has said many times that rail users must pay for the upgrading and maintenance of the infrastructure they use. This would be fine if road freight operators were required to do the same, but studies show that they are only contributing about a quarter of the amount required. In contrast, although both road and rail operators pay diesel fuel excise, about 60% of the duty paid on loco fuel goes on road improvements.Private train operators simply cannot compete with truckers on these terms. Some are asking for zero access charges in the Melbourne – Sydney – Brisbane corridor as a way of compensating for the huge investment which is going into parallel highways, which are constantly being improved at public expense.No responsible investor would put money into rail infrastructure on this basis, especially as a large part of the interstate network has been neglected for decades and is incapable of being operated efficiently because speeds are low and many passing loops too short.Also, the private sector is unlikely to invest in state-based railways. What they want is an integrated national trunk network owned and managed by one central authority, whether publicly or privately controlled. This is the conundrum for government.Developing a national policyThe absence at the federal level of any coherent policy to develop a commercial rail freight industry that can compete effectively with road and win back not just tonnage but market share is a very serious deficiency.A business environment survey by the OECD’s Economic Intelligence Unit, published in May, ranked Australia 12th out of 58 countries, but the quality and extensiveness of rail infrastructure was in the lowest tier of indicators (2 out of 5) along with strikes, skill shortages and restrictive labour laws.Despite this handicap, rail managed to haul 100 billion net tonne-km in 1994-95, which is 56% of the combined road and rail freight task outside urban areas. Admittedly, a high proportion of this is accounted for by heavy haul operations in Queensland and Western Australia which in general have not lacked private or public investment.But the remarkable transformation of privately owned, unsubsidised and vertically integrated railways in the USA from near bankruptcy in the 1970s to highly effective competition with road for general freight in the 1990s shows what key legislative and policy changes can achieve. oCAPTION: National Rail is taking delivery of 120 new NR class diesels from A Goninan & Co in Perth and Newcastle. Two NRs and a Clyde-EMD DL class tackle the steep curves and sharp grades in northern SA with a 1·5 km long Perth – Sydney superfreighterCAPTION: NSW Freight Corp uses Canadian-built 90 class diesels under a Clyde-EMD power-by-the-hour contract for its lucrative Hunter Valley coal operations, which may soon be challenged by private competitorsCAPTION: Australian National’s Leigh Creek coal business accounted for about one-third of its South Australian revenue, but instead of including it in the sell-off, ownership was transferred to South Australia power company Optima Energy, significantly reducing the sale valueCAPTION: Australia’s first privatised country passenger service links Melbourne and Warrnambool in Victoria; West Coast Railway’s ’WestCoaster’ is headed by an overhauled 40-year-old EMD S class dieselCAPTION: National Rail has introduced double-stack operation on the Trans-Australia route across the Nullarbor. Originating in Melbourne, the new 5-pack wagons on this Perth-bound superfreighter were ’doubled up’ in Adelaide for the 110 km/h trunk haulUn vide politique obscurcit un brillant avenirLes chemins de fer australiens font actuellement l’objet d’une restructuration massive visant à privatiser une majeure partie, voire l’industrie entière. Mais le prix que les sociétés devront payer pour acquérir les marchés à vendre – dont un grand nombre sont en perte à l’heure actuelle, est déprimé par le manque des politiciens fédéraux à comprendre le besoin de réforme structurale du secteur des transports préalablement à la privatisationPolitisches Vakuum trübt sonnige ZukunftAustraliens Eisenbahnen werden einer massiven Umstrukturierung unterzogen, die auf eine Privatisierung eines großen Teils, wenn nicht des gesamten Wirtschaftszweigs abzielt. Der Preis, den Unternehmen für den Erwerb der zum Verkauf stehenden Geschäfte – von denen viele zur Zeit Verluste machen – zahlen werden, wird allerdings dadurch herabgesetzt, daß bundesstaatliche Politiker nicht die Notwendigkeit einer strukturellen Reform des Verkehrssektors vor einer Privatisierung verstehenEl vacío político plantea nubes a un futuro brillanteLos ferrocarriles australianos estlast_img read more

Saudi Aramco orders 13 jackets from McDermott

first_imgMcDermott International has been awarded a large contract from Saudi Aramco for the engineering, procurement, construction and installation of 13 jackets in the Zuluf, Marjan, Berri and Abu Safah fields, offshore Saudi Arabia.McDermott defines a large contract as between $50 million and $250 million.This is the fourth fast-track project to be awarded to McDermott by Saudi Aramco in the last 24 months. The combined total weight of the structures is approximately 26,455 short tons (24,000 metric tons), McDermott noted in a statement on Wednesday.For this latest contract award, McDermott said it plans to use its engineering teams in Dubai and Chennai with construction taking place at McDermott’s facilities in Jebel Ali, Dubai and Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Vessels from McDermott’s global fleet are scheduled to undertake the installation and completions work.Linh Austin, McDermott Vice President, Middle East and Caspian, said: “Since 2001, McDermott has built and installed over 121 jackets for Saudi Aramco with a total weight of over 220,462 tons (200,000 metric tons). Not only is McDermott able to meet the schedules of fast-track projects, but we consistently deliver them with outstanding safety performance.”The contract award will be reflected in McDermott’s first quarter 2018 backlog and work is expected to be carried out through the second half of 2018.last_img read more

140 Ruby Princess crew members test positive for COVID-19

first_imgThe ship is subject of an investigation by the NSW Police as it is believed to have become Australia’s biggest source of COVID-19 infections. It is linked to hundreds of confirmed coronavirus cases and a number of deaths. In NSW, 369 passengers who were on the Ruby Princess have tested positive and there have been 8 deaths associated with the ship. In addition, there are 12 Ruby Princess crew members with COVID-19 in health facilities in NSW. The vessel has a total of 1,040 crew members on board. A total of 140 crew members of the cruise ship Ruby Princess, which is still docked in Australian waters, have tested positive for COVID-19. In response to the recent order from the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Princess Cruises, operator of Ruby Princess, canceled all voyages through June 30, 2020. The company also canceled all Princess Alaska Gulf cruise and cruise tours. center_img “This global outbreak continues to challenge our world in unimaginable ways. We recognize how disappointing this is to our long-term business partners and thousands of employees, many of whom have been with us in Alaska for decades,” said Jan Swartz, president of Princess Cruises. The figure is being revealed after 13 more crew members tested positive to the virus in the latest round of testing, data from the New South Wales Ministry of Health (NSW Health) shows. “We hope everyone impacted by these cancellations – especially our guests, travel advisor partners, teammates, and the communities we visit – understand our decision to do our part to protect the safety.”last_img read more

Sevilla confirm Uchenna Kanu’s exit

first_imgSevilla revealed through their official website that the Falcons star, Uchenna Kanu, has left the club alongside other players who no longer want to continue with the club. It would be recalled that Kanu has signed two year deal with Swedish Damallsvenskan side Linkopings FC. The full statement from Sevilla reads: “Sevilla FC has confirmed today several of the footballers who will not continue in the women’s first team for the coming season.Advertisement Counting the already known case of Jeni Morilla, there are other soccer players who will not carry the elastic sevillista in the 2020-2021 exercise.” read also:Uchenna Kanu completes deal with Sevilla “Thus, Aldana Cometti, Yanara Aedo, Sabrina Flores, Uchenna Kanu, Claire Falknor, Nadya Karpova and Olga Carmona are the ones who have joined the Coria del Río soccer player so far, Olga having the express desire to say goodbye in the next dates to through this website after having decided to embark on a new professional path. Sevilla FC wants to thank the services provided and wishes them luck in the future.” FacebookTwitterWhatsAppEmail分享 center_img Loading…last_img read more

Mi22ion IMCA Modified racing to raise awareness, help prevent veteran suicide

first_imgSean Stacy took to the Dirt Track at Las Vegas Motor Speedway’s Duel In the Desert in this IMCA Modified to continue raising awareness on behalf of the Mission 22 organization. (Photo by Tom Macht, VEGAS, Nev. – Sean Stacy raced for more than a tall trophy or any amount of money at the 20th annual Duel In The Desert.The 17-year-old from Kearny, Ariz., was behind the wheel of the number Mi22ion IMCA Modified, which gets its number from Mission 22, an organization dedicated to providing treatment for and preventing suicide by military veterans.Raising awareness about the 22 veterans who take their own lives each day because of Post-Traumatic Stress has been Stacy’s goal throughout his rookie season.“This is something that has affected many families,” said Stacy’s father and car owner Curtis. “We were having fun racing then began to see that this was one way we could make a difference.”Primarily sponsored by the Las Vegas Firefighters and Benefit Association, which counts many military veterans among its membership, the Mi22ion car raced six nights this season, at Arizona Speedway and at Central Arizona Speedway prior to the Duel In The Desert.Stacy was ninth in the Young Guns event at the Duel. His final outing of the season will be at Central Arizona’s Nov. 17-19 Desert Thunder Nationals.“This was Sean’s idea and it’s gone really well. Hundreds of people have asked questions about the organization and we’ve done a lot of Facebook marketing for sponsors,” Curtis Stacy said. “We have already had at least three veterans seek help as a result of the car.”The Arizona Modified Tour will kick off the 2018 season for the Stacy team. They’ll be regulars at Arizona Speedway and Central Arizona and hope to be at Boone for the IMCA Speedway Motors Super Nationals fueled by Casey’s in September.Information about Mission 22 and programs it offers for veterans is available at the website.last_img read more

Wenger needs to learn – Usmanov

first_imgArsenal’s second largest shareholder Alisher Usmanov has told Arsene Wenger to start learning from his mistakes and claims the Gunners need to strengthen the entire team to compete with the best in Europe. Wenger’s position as manager has come under intense scrutiny in recent seasons as the team has drifted further away from a serious challenge in either the Barclays Premier League or the Champions League. Usmanov, who has not been offered a place on the Arsenal board, admits it is “frustrating” to be excluded from discussing the manager’s future but suggested he still supports the Frenchman, adding “the club leadership relies on Wenger”. Arsenal spent £35million to sign Alexis Sanchez in the summer, a year after breaking the club’s transfer record to buy Mesut Ozil for £42.4million. Usmanov insists, however, that money is available to add more quality and Wenger must not allow his principles to translate into “lost possibilities”. “Does (Wenger) have money or not? There is officially money in the club,” Usmanov said. “My opinion – and I tell it openly – we need to strengthen every position to play on the level of such teams in [the] UK as Chelsea and Manchester City, in Europe like Real Madrid, Barcelona, Paris St Germain and other clubs.” The Russian billionaire, who owns 30 per cent of the club, was keen to emphasise his admiration for Wenger but believes the Frenchman is letting his principles stand in the way of Arsenal’s success. The Gunners have lifted just one trophy in nine-and-a-half years and a 2-0 defeat at home to Manchester United on Sunday marked the team’s worst start to a season since 1982. Press Association Usmanov told CNBC: “Arsene Wenger is one of the greatest coaches, not just of European, but of world football. “But we have a Russian proverb which goes, ‘Even an old lady can have a roof falling on her’. “Everybody makes mistakes. He can make mistakes and I know as you age it is more difficult, more challenging to accept one’s mistakes.” Usmanov continued: “The potential of the team is there but there is no critical evaluation of mistakes and they need to acknowledge them. “Because no genius can retain the same level of genius if they do not acknowledge mistakes. “It’s only when you admit your mistakes that you can get rid of them. I wish this to my club. “Nothing bad is happening apart from repeating the same high result – we keep being in the middle of the Champions League but we only lose the first play-off games. “Some may be happy with that but as a share holder, I am not.” last_img read more

Stocks Drop After Twin Dose of Bad News

first_imgThe Dow Jones Industrial Average is down more than 400 points in early trading today on Wall Street.A double dose of bad market indicators to start the week is being blamed for all three major indexes being down more than one-and-a-half percent.BREAKING: Stocks plunge for second straight day as market selloff continues following weakest manufacturing data in TEN YEARS. “We have now tariffed our way into a manufacturing recession,” says one expert #TrumpSlump #TrumpRecession— The Daily Edge (@TheDailyEdge) October 2, 2019 Poor job numbers this morning in addition to yesterday’s report of the worst manufacturing numbers in a decade have renewed fears a recession is coming.Recession Alarm as Global Stocks Plunge#recession #RecessionIsComing— (@Cryptoversity1) October 2, 2019last_img read more

John set to defend Ricks & Sari/Reagan Rodrigues Cycling title on Sunday

first_imgCOME Sunday, the 15th annual Ricks and Sari/Reagan Rodrigues Memorial cycling road race will pedal off on the roadways of West Demerara, and defending champion, Team Coco’s cyclist Jamual John, will have his hands full with Guyana’s leading cyclists gunning for his title.The event, which is organised by National cycling coach Hassan Mohamed, will begin at Schoonord, head to Bushy Park and back to the point of origin for the finish, a route that spans 46 miles.John, who is now getting into his stride, won last year’s senior category in a time of one hour 41 minutes 38 seconds. Adealie Hodge is the defending Junior champion and Paul Cho-Wee-Nam will also be looking to retain his title in the veteran category. Julio Melville was last year’s Mountain Bike category winner.Prizes to be distributed include 8 prime (sprint) prizes while the top six riders in the senior category and the top three in the Junior, Veteran, Mountain Bike and Female categories will receive prizes. There will also be a prize for the oldest rider.The late Rodrigues was born on February 21, 1948 and passed away on August 4, 2004. During his lifetime he served as the president of Carlton Wheelers Cycling Club and was also a champion race car driver.last_img read more